The "Transition Integrity Project" / "The Podesta Plan" - Guerrilla Warfare Strategy for CIVIL WAR

The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) conducted its “war gaming” exercises in June 2020, bringing together over 100 participants to simulate the aftermath of the 2020 election. These simulations were designed to anticipate and game out four election crisis scenarios. The resulting report, titled “Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election,” established a framework where the outcome of nearly every scenario generated “street violence and political impasse” or a “constitutional crisis,” serving as a pre-justification for subsequent political disruptions.

---

Aside on Pedo Podesta

This is a clear reference for those “in the know” to the ancient Egyptian Mystery Cults — The Egyptian God Osiris is traditionally dismembered into 14 pieces, when the widow Isis revives Osiris using magic, she finds all pieces except for the phallus which she recasts in gold. The Lost Phallus of Osiris is thrown into the Nile and eaten by THREE fish: Ignorance, Superstition & Fear (Mob, Church, State) - “That which is lost” is the Obelisk / Lost Word / Lost Phallus of Osiris

---

Sources, Links & Videos

I highly recommend the article here as it includes a lot of smaller details and information regarding the people behind the project and their connections.

The Transition Integrity Project. The Step By Step Plan To Rig The 2020 Election

Extended Notes

You can read additional notes here: https://docs.urbanodyssey.xyz/reading/podesta-plan.html

Video Deep Dive

CIA Psychological Operations Docs

I’ve included these documents as references as I wanted direct comparisons between the “Transition Integrity Project” and actual PsyOp / Guerrilla Warfare techniques.

See the Right-Focused Side of the PsyOp (Christian Nationalism / False Light)

1. Notes from Dance of Life - https://docs.urbanodyssey.xyz/bible/dance-of-life.html

2. Christian Nationalism Notes - https://docs.urbanodyssey.xyz/mahanism/christian-nationalism.html

Other Links

1. Transition Integrity Project Report - Preventing a Disrupted Presidential Election & Transition - https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/7013152/Preventing-a-Disrupted-Presidential-Election-and.pdf

2. https://thenationalpulse.com/archive-post/links-between-transition-integrity-project-and-atlantic-mag/

3. https://archive.fo/ZGmMJ

4. https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/16474/how-to-steal-an-election

5. https://www.influencewatch.org/organization/transition-integrity-project/

6. https://www.thethinkingconservative.com/transition-integrity-project/

7. https://web.archive.org/web/20200910200735/https://www.transitionintegrityproject.org/about-us/

8. https://www.infowars.com/posts/video-watch-democrat-foot-soldiers-spill-the-beans-on-john-podestas-plan-to-trigger-a-new-american-civil-war

Other Videos

Assorted Images

https://x.com/SomeBitchIIKnow/status/1853605671847051402

https://x.com/HarrisonHSmith/status/1968497238860087403

https://x.com/BradentuckyProd/status/1977972076175581243

---

Full Deep-Dive Analysis

The Transition Integrity Project (TIP) document, ostensibly a safeguard against political disruption, functions under the Codex Umbra lens as a pre-meditated tactical manual for establishing narrative control and justifying “irregular” political action. Its intentions, when scrutinized against the tenets of guerrilla and psychological warfare doctrine, reveal a sophisticated operation of sociopolitical conditioning designed to legitimize chaos and undermine a clear electoral outcome unfavorable to the participants.

This deep dive dissects the TIP architecture, its simulated crisis scenarios, and the chilling resonance between its proposed actions and established doctrine governing psychological operations (PSYOP) and insurgency tactics.

Download the Full Audio Version

I. GENESIS AND ARCHITECTURE OF THE OPERATION

The Transition Integrity Project was launched in late 2019 out of a professed concern that the Trump Administration might “manipulate, ignore, undermine or disrupt” the 2020 election and transition. This stated objective serves as the necessary veneer of integrity to shield the subsequent, provocative gaming of scenarios.

A. The Vector of Influence and Bias

The TIP convened over 100 individuals, including current and former senior government, campaign leaders, and experts, for crisis scenario planning in June 2020. Critically, the organization is characterized not as truly bipartisan, but as “functionally left-progressive and Democratic-leaning,” united by their opposition to President Trump.

The core architects and participants demonstrate a deep embedding within specific ideological and power structures:

1. Key Personnel: Leaders include Rosa Brooks (Georgetown law professor, former State Department advisor, formerly linked to George Soros’ Open Society Foundation) and Nils Gilman (linked to the Berggruen Institute and the Chinese Communist Party).

2. Political Operatives: The inclusion of figures such as John Podesta (longtime Clinton political dynasty handler, who role-played the Biden campaign) and Donna Brazile (former DNC acting chair who leaked debate questions in 2016) confirms the high-level operational engagement by established Democratic power brokers.

3. The Never Trumper Faction: Nominally Republican participants, such as Michael Steele, David Frum, and Bill Kristol, operate under the unifying principle of anti-Trump antagonism, providing a thin disguise of bipartisanship for the operation.

This calculated assembly suggests a pre-existing ideological synchronization vital for executing a unified revolutionary disruption, achieving the level of coordinated action described in texts on political warfare.

II. THE CARTOGRAPHY OF CHAOS: TIP SCENARIO ANALYSIS

The TIP war-gamed four scenarios: a decisive Biden win, a narrow Biden win, a decisive Trump win, and extended uncertainty. The results were universally alarming, predicting “street-level violence and political crisis” in every outcome except a decisive Biden victory.

A. Gaming the Coup: Challenging a Decisive Trump Victory

The most revealing outcome stems from the “decisive Trump win” scenario. Instead of allowing the outcome to stand, the architects gamed out how the Biden campaign would initiate “unprecedented crazy stuff” to prevent Trump’s inauguration. This exercise was intrinsically designed to undermine a clear electoral mandate unfavorable to the participants.

The tactics gamed by Team Trump involved casting doubt on results, encouraging chaos/violence, using disinformation, seizing mail-in ballots (via the Attorney General), and deploying federal agents or the military (Invoking the Insurrection Act).

However, the primary intent of the simulation was to outline the aggressive response of Team Biden. In a scenario where Biden won the popular vote but lost the Electoral College (resembling 2016), Team Biden’s strategy was to force Trump into provocative actions—such as supporting California’s secession or submitting a second slate of electors—which would play into a narrative of Democrats attempting to orchestrate an illegal coup. John Podesta, role-playing Biden, refused to concede, leading to threats of secession from Western states (California, Oregon, Washington) unless structural reforms (like abolishing the Electoral College and granting DC/Puerto Rico statehood) were enacted.

The audacity of advocating for state secession or submitting rival electors—acts widely deemed a threat to democracy if carried out by the incumbent—is rationalized within the TIP framework by using projection, a key technique: blaming Trump for creating the conditions that necessitated these “irregular” actions.

B. The Military Imperative

The TIP report explicitly raised concerns over the military’s response in an uncertain result. The gaming demonstrated reliance on the military establishment’s ideological alignment, with the Joint Chiefs of Staff potentially leaking internal discussions about resignation to signal their loyalty to the Constitution over the incumbent President/party, effectively setting the stage to back the declared winner determined by Congress. This fear of “plausible scenarios” where senior military officials simply tell the President “No, sir. We’re not doing that,” reflects earlier strategic thinking aimed at removing Trump via “extra-judicial means,” including a military coup.

III. RESONANCE WITH IRREGULAR CONFLICT DOCTRINE

The TIP methodology aligns disturbingly well with documented psychological and guerrilla warfare tactics aimed at destabilizing a regime and installing a preferred order. Guerrilla warfare is fundamentally a political war where the main target is the mind of the “political animal” (the human being), turning Psychological Operations into the factor that determines the results.

A. Mass Mobilization and Agitation (FM 3-05.302/PSYCHOLOGICAL OPERATIONS IN GUERRILLA WARFARE)

The TIP strategy is dependent on mass mobilization and “people taking peacefully to the streets in large numbers”. This is a central feature of classic insurgency and PSYOP targeting:

B. Disinformation, Narrative Control, and Institutional Subversion

The TIP report acts as an information warfare strategy for “revolutionary political purposes”. This is achieved by manipulating the information environment:

1. Weaponizing Media and Projection: The report provides the foundational narrative—that Trump would cheat and refuse to leave office. This pre-conditioning allows sympathetic media to synchronize narratives (”expect violence,” “Trump made us do it”) and rationalize “unconventional strategies”. This is overt propaganda establishment. The tactic of using projection to preemptively accuse Trump of the actions the opposing side intends to execute is a conscious method to “justify the Left’s ‘irregular’ plans to disrupt the election process”.

2. Subverting Institutions: The plan contemplates co-opting the already politically sympathetic Washington D.C. federal bureaucracy. Similarly, guerrilla operations emphasize infiltration and subjective internal control of existing institutions (front organizations like labor unions, political parties, etc.) to prepare the populace for “a fury of justified violence” at a crucial moment. The ultimate goal of this infiltration is to develop the capability to create the effect of a “whip” within the population, enabling a commander to shake down and replace the existing structure.

IV. CONCLUSION: THE RAW TRUTH OF THE PLAYBOOK

The Transition Integrity Project, far from being a neutral academic exercise safeguarding democracy, served as a centralized planning operation for anticipating, engineering, and legitimizing specific, disruptive outcomes unfavorable to the incumbent President. The detailed “war games” provided a political framework for activating institutional biases, aligning media narratives, and justifying mass, potentially violent, political mobilization—tactics that bear the unmistakable hallmarks of political-military insurgency and psychological consolidation efforts designed to effect regime change by contesting legitimacy.

The outcome was predetermined: unless the opposition won decisively, the environment would be engineered for “chaos, violence, and a constitutional crisis”. This playbook represents the calculated fusing of political intelligence and psychological operations aimed at forcing a specific transition of power, regardless of a clear electoral result. The true integrity project was ensuring the mechanism for revolutionary disruption was primed, justified, and ready for deployment.